🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.